"A Thousand Suns", Linkin Parks concept album, is apparently based around the idea of a fear of what's happening around the world. But did the newest video from that album actually predict the cause of some of this fear before it even occurred? See what you think after watching the video for "Burning in the Skies":
Now maybe this is just me, but it seems like this video could have been entirely about the Japanese tsunami. In fact I did assume at first that this is exactly what it was, until I checked the date this video was made. It premièred on the 23rd February 2011. Two and a half weeks before the tsunami.
So there's that. Either Linkin Park are secret clairvoyants who warn the world of tragedies through music videos. Or it's a coincidence and the shock of the disaster means everyone's relating everything to it. Either way it doesn't mean we shouldn't discuss it.
![]() |
| You knew! And you were too busy making Saw movies to tell us! |
Let's take a look at the events of the video that have led us to this conclusion shall we? It starts with people drinking, playing table football, opening a book. A normal, slow motion day for most of the world. Most of these shots could have been taken straight from the Social Network by the looks of them. But mixed in to these are the shots of people sitting down, staring at the television. They look serious. Something important is happening and they don't want to miss a second of it.
Now look at the other people. The child in a tent. The girl with the book. The old lady looking at a picture. What do you notice? They're all asian.
Sure there are non-asian people there too, but Japan's a modern, multi-national country. That's only to be expected. And look at these people. They're drinking, playing stupid games and hooking up in cars facing a city. They're all students and early-twenty-ers. The sorts of people who would go on placements and gap years to Japan.
The disaster shown in the video isn't really that clear. It looks like the shock wave of a bomb, but without the massive explosion and mushroom cloud that you would usually see in a video depicting this. Things are shown shaking, people panicking, objects breaking. It's an earthquake.
Everything goes to hell. You see people scrambling around trying to hide from the danger that's not just around them but on top of them, below them, inside them. Everything collapses. Everyone falls.
And the family all still sit down in front of the TV. They are watching the news. They are watching the disaster unfold on live television, as we all were just a few days ago. They watch as fear and panic spread faster than the tidal waves, as homes and possessions are destroyed, as people are swept away, as lives are ruined and more are lost. They watch in horror as the turmoil and pain explode out of their television sets. Powerless to help.
One recurring image is that of a girl, eyes closed, hair flying out in all directions, as if she's falling in slow motion. But that's not it. She's underwater. She's drowning. Her body is now floating gently in the torrents of water that sweep through everything. And the final shot of the video? That last image that we are left with for ten seconds? Something that's been a theme throughout the whole video?
Water.
How can we now see this video as anything else?
You are not powerless to help. The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies are raising funds to help those affected by the earthquake and tsunami across Japan. You can help them by donating here: http://www.ifrc.org/en/get-involved/donate/donation/
Please give as much as you can. (UK readers may have to do some quick currency conversion sums, but is that really too much effort?)
For more from SATV follow us on Twitter @ShameAboutTheV







I think it's a little bit of a stretch, and maybe even a little absurd to think Linkin Park "predicted" any kind of natural disaster, specifically the earthquake and consequential tsunami in Japan.
ReplyDeleteI think the video isn't a reflection of any specific event that has happened in the past, or as you're saying, the future, but instead is a generalization at the world we live in, in that any moment could be our last.
The video is a great vehicle in putting across the open ended narrative presented in their recent album "A Thousand Suns". The album deals with destruction, the individuality of experiencing that and ultimately how we relate to this on a personal level.
The video in my opinion is another chapter in the visualized story-arch "A Thousand Suns" and subsequently their music videos create. If you look at their first two videos from the album, "The Catalyst" is the aftermath of what has happened. "Waiting For The End" is the moments in which this "Atomic Bomb" hits and theoretically takes place during the bridge of this song. It may sound confusing, but when the "Atomic Bomb" hits, we are presented with a series of images resembling the previous Waiting For The End video, leading us to know that it takes place during those moments in this video. So in order it goes:
Burning In The Skies (Before Atomic Bomb Hits)
Waiting For The End (During Atomic Bomb)
The Catalyst (After Atomic Bomb)
Joe Hahn, the director of these videos is doing a great job of artistically presenting these themes and visuals A Thousand Suns does, and I think it's a little more generalized and open ended than your interpretation of it, as simply being some kind of vision into the future with the focus on a specific event.
(continued below due to character limit...)
I believe the note about the characters of Asian decent appearing in the video is nothing more than a coincidence, and definitely a stretch in your interpretation. This video was filmed in LA, and It's clear from the scene in which the Atomic Bomb hits, that this is the city impact occurs. I'm sure Joe Hahn didn't want to generalize a city, and this is merely an aspect of location for shooting, but I don't think they ever intended to specify a city. Maybe the Asian characters are connected in some way? Maybe they're family? Maybe it's coincidence and they're just actors and their ethnicity isn't important in the context of the video? You bring up Japan being a multi-national city, but so is LA, and every major city in this day and age. Joe & Mike have Asian heritage so I'm not surprised a little of that culture and influence comes into Joe's direction and art.
ReplyDeleteAs for the water, yes, I guess that could be related to the "tsunami" you speak of, but this could be the aftermath of the atomic bomb which I'm sure, can cause a chain event of the world coming to an end, creating natural disasters and destroying the world along the way. This could also be a subtle link back to "The Catalyst" where we see Chester (vocalist) submerged in water, take from that what you will, but there can be a number of metaphors applied to this imagery)Like I said, I guess you could link that to what happened in Japan recently, but this isn't the first time. Linkin Park are founders of the charity Music For Relief, and have been supporters of Natural Disaster relief for many years now, specifically Hurricane Katrina in 2005, which could also be applied to your theory and logic.
Could the visuals of an Atomic Bomb hitting Earth be a metaphor of a natural disaster? Sure, but do I think it's a vision of the Earthquake in Japan? Absolutely not. The timing of this video release couldn't be more relevant and it's a good thing that these interpretations can be made. I admire the thought and dedication in creating this post, but I just think Linkin Park have managed to capture a subject which we will always be able to relate to, and the recent events have made this more clearer than ever.
To the guy above ^^^^^^^^
ReplyDeleteLearn how to judge the tone of a piece of literature before mouthing off.
Ta
Uhhh, if you think that was "mouthing off", then it is you, sir, who needs to learn the tone of a piece of literature.
ReplyDeleteMy response was anything but that, it was just a case of looking at the video from a different perspective. I even said I respected the OP and found the post interesting. Wow, talk about missing the mark on your unnecessary "anonymous" reply.
You don't think I picked up on the tongue in cheek approach to writing this "theory"? There was just as much in there to suggest valid thought than there wasn't. Seriously, Just when I think there might be a case of some actual intelligent conversation on the subject, I'm proven wrong by another "anonymous" poster on my first visit to the blog, who doesn't have anything constructive to reply with and instead completely mis-understands my post.
Next time I won't waste my time contributing to a blog I thought, might actually enjoy some discussion on the subject. Wow. See you around Mr. Anonymous.
Cheers
It's also hilarious to see you take to twitter and quote my posts, "#IHaveTheBestCommenters" is the best hash tag ever, simply because judging from your dying blog, I'm your only commenter in a long time. Way to treat traffic you don't have "Anonymous" blog owner.
ReplyDeleteI actually found your post interesting, I knew you was writing a satirical piece on the video and thought I'd humor that and try and give you a different take on the video, ya' know, concerning the topic... that you posted.
For a guy with 50 followers on Twitter and hardly fuck all traffic, I thought you would do a better job of taking the time to give a shit about people interested in your blog. Even if you do mistake them as someone "mouthing off".
I won't be coming here again. Thanks for the shout outs on Twitter and shit. Later dude.
Hi. I'm the one who wrote this article, so I'll start off by just clarifying that I am not the anonymous commenter above. They are a completely different person with their own thoughts and opinions and feelings and dreams and such. I suppose I can't really prove that without anonymous revealing themselves, but I can assure you that I am definitely not big-headed enough to refer to some stupid thing I wrote as "literature" (though I was ecstatic that someone else did).
ReplyDeleteSo let's all just give each other the basic respect to assume we are all real people. Thanks.
@Alfred Borden: I did mean to address your comments earlier but unfortunately real life got in the way and I only had time for a couple of mocking tweets. I shall remedy this now. Yes I agree that it is more than a little absurd to assume that Linkin Park predicted a natural disaster and I agree with your interpretation of the video entirely. Unfortunately that interpretation is neither amusing nor entertaining which is why my article didn't just go in to all of that.
So thank you for giving a real analysis of the video, but please do not get too annoyed at anonymous because you did write it in a way that seemed very clear that you completely misunderstood the article. Hence anonymous's comments and my making fun of you on twitter. Now you have clarified that you did in fact understand the tone, I think we all feel better about the world and no longer think you are a gibbering moron. Just that you maybe need to take things a little more lightly.
To address your later comments (the angry ones): I'm glad you find it hilarious that people are laughing at you on twitter. It's good to laugh at yourself. You referenced my lack of commenters and you are right, you were in fact one of very few people who have contributed to this site. However this whole thing is still in its infancy - without checking I think we only have about 12 posts - so really I think it is a little unfair to refer to this as a "dying" blog. In fact seeing as I got two comments from you and another from anonymous within 24 hours of the post going live I actually consider this progress. This also applies to twitter followers. Though I don't really consider that number a sign of success, I have only had twitter for little over a month now, and 50 followers seems pretty good to me. Also you have no idea how much traffic this site gets so please don't assume you do. You know what happens when you assume, don't you? You make an ass out of you and then I make an ass out of you (that's how that goes right?). So to respond to your completely ignorant remark I can assure you that this site is in fact growing, rather than dying.
And once again, I wasn't anonymous so you were aiming your rage in completely the wrong direction and made yourself look rather foolish by...wait for it...MOUTHING OFF! HA!
Anyway, sorry you won't be stopping by again. Later "dude"...
@Anonymous: Thank you.
I really do have the best commenters.
Weeee...
ReplyDeleteIts about the injustice in our society where anyone can be persecuted for a crime they did not commit by public opinion and being framed. Anyone could have a criminal stalker (fish in bowl). At the end reality breaks: there were never any fish. The innocent boy is portrayed in many ways, old man, guy in car, guy centered in screen at party, running from the explosion, chester. Inoocent boy later framed runs in the street with his right hand in the air (i swear to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help me God; but is that enough if you are framed). Good thing the kid chased some ass as the city which the crimes were commited explodes unknowingly infront and away from him. God saved his life by placing him away from the criminals conspiracy. People on couch watches the documentary about it and find out the person being framed is someone they know and the girl reading the book on the innocent person is doing a school report and is shaken to her core as she realises the posibility to be in the same situation is as real as God (the supposed impossible). The world is never the same as they find out all the crimes in there area and how anyone can plant there dna to give the illusion of guilty in the court of law. A pefect crime to have another take the fall. The war is already here, wise up or kill the innocent.
ReplyDeleteAlso in the catalyst video you can see the same concept as criminals are portrayed with tatoos mixed with the innocent and how they are at war by tainting the other. Chester almost submerged under the water represents an innocent struggling to keep his head above in the society that cant possibly understand the struggles he is going through. If they did they would lift him up and let him go.
ReplyDeleteNice analysis. Fancy writing something for the site?
ReplyDelete